Skip to content

Month: February 2019

How to Respond to an EEOC Charge

Image of a woman holding a sign that has "Hate" crossed out to tie into the theme of how to respond to an EEOC charge as many of them concern discrimination.

Photo by T. Chick McClure on Unsplash

What is the EEOC?

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is the government agency that enforces several laws relating to discrimination including those that protect employees from discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age (40 and older), disability, and genetic information. It also protects employees from retaliation because they filed an EEOC charge, complained of discrimination, or testified or participated in an investigation or lawsuit involving an employment discrimination charge. Under the Federal law employers with 15 or more employees must not discriminate against individuals based on any of the above characteristics. Many states have employee thresholds that are less than 15 employees.

If a company has an EEOC charge filed against them, then it needs to be prepared to respond. Obviously, the best practice is to avoid circumstances that could lead to a discrimination lawsuit.

Creating a Record

The first goal of any employer should be to avoid an EEOC charge. It is not possible to ensure that there is no risk of lawsuit when you fire or discipline an employee. Adverse employment decisions can be gray.

However, there are a number of things that can be done to reduce the risk of a lawsuit.  Here is an earlier post that discusses many of the items that should be considered. To summarize, any time you discipline an employee (and ultimately terminate them) you need to consider the following to reduce the chance of an employee filing a discrimination charge against a company:

  1. Was the employee aware of the company policy that they violated?
  2. How many times has the employee violated the policy and other policies?
  3. Did the company apply the progressive discipline policy?
  4. Has the company documented the violation and prior violations? Was the corrective action documented?
  5. What level of discipline does the employer’s policy require?
  6. What discipline did other employees that have violated the policy receive?
  7. Is there any reason to reduce the punishment? Are there mitigating circumstances?

Whenever a company disciplines an employee it needs to create a record of the discipline. Every company should have a discipline form that tells employees what rule they violated and any corrective action that will be taken. Employers should have employees sign and date the form. If they refuse to sign, then the HR manager or a supervisor can write on the form that “the employee refuses to sign,” and date and sign next to this statement. In this way, every employer can control the record for any actions that it took in response to employee behavior.

Unfortunately, this step will only prevent or limit claims related to actions that the company formally took. It does nothing for discrimination claims that are based on the actions of a supervisor or boss that are acting unprofessionally by joining in or encouraging misbehavior or the result of the actions of fellow employees. These situations are especially common in cases of sexual harassment. You can review how to limit sexual harassment in one of my prior posts.

When You Receive the EEOC Charge

First you need to review the charge to determine what is alleged. You should review the information carefully to determine:

  • What law was violated?
  • Who is alleged to have been involved?
  • When did the alleged action occur? (Note: some actions may be barred by the statute of limitations.)
  • Are any documents mentioned?
  • Who, if anyone, committed the alleged unlawful conduct?
  • Does the company have any record of the unlawful conduct?
  • If so, did the company take any action to resolve the conduct?

Preserve any necessary records that are related to the allegations. Companies should also quickly alert the team that will be responsible for responding to the allegations including outside counsel, inside counsel, HR, and/or management.

Start Your Investigation and Response

Investigations need to take place quickly so that you can respond to the EEOC in a timely manner. The EEOC will also start its investigation after it issues the charge. The EEOC will generally begin the investigation by requesting a number of documents from the company including the employee’s personnel file, any relevant rules, and the employee handbook. The EEOC will also want to speak with witnesses and possibly come onsite. All of these witnesses, management and non-management, should be prepared to speak with the EEOC. Attorneys for the company may need to meet with these individuals to ensure they are ready. The EEOC will also request that the employer provide a written statement with its position on the allegations.

The EEOC has done a great job outlining how to draft a statement of position:

• Address each alleged discriminatory act and your position regarding it and provide copies of documents supporting your position and/or version of events.
• Provide a description of the organization; include the organization’s legal name and address, the name, address, title, telephone number and email address of the person responsible for responding to the charge, the primary nature of the business, and the number of employees. A staffing or organizational chart is also useful in helping to focus the investigation.
• Provide any applicable practices, policies or procedures applicable to the allegations in the charge.
• Identify any individuals other than the Charging Party who have been similarly affected by these practices, policies or procedures; describe the circumstances in which the practices, policies, or procedures have been applied.
• Explain why individuals who were in a similar situation to the Charging Party were not similarly affected.
• Identify official(s) who made decisions or took action relating to the matter(s) raised in the charge.
• Be specific about date(s), action(s) and location(s) applicable to this case.
• Provide internal investigations of the alleged incidents or grievance hearing reports.
Inform EEOC if the matter has been resolved or can be resolved; if it can be resolved, please indicate your proposal for resolution.

The statement of position is an important step in responding to the allegations. A good statement of position can make it easier to settle a case or challenge the allegations after the EEOC issues a determination.

Consider Whether to Use Mediation

Companies can settle claims that the EEOC investigates at many stages in the process and can do it before the EEOC gets involved if the claim is settled before the individual files an EEOC charge. In fact, the EEOC has its own mediation/settlement process because it strongly encourages settlement.

The EEOC has a great explanation of why companies should consider mediation:

It is free.
It is confidential. Information disclosed in mediation will not be shared with anyone, including EEOC investigators and lawyers, and will not be used against you by EEOC.
It can save you time and money. Mediation usually occurs early in the charge process, and many mediations are completed in one meeting. If successful, the charge is resolved and you avoid potentially lengthy, uncertain and expensive litigation.
It allows you to design your own solution. You and the employee determine how to resolve the issue in a mutually acceptable way.

Mediation is often a cheaper option for an employer, but companies must be prepared to accept the consequences of settlement/mediation.

Conclusion

No one wants to face an EEOC charge of discrimination from an employee. These charges often go public and lead to headlines like this: “Absolut Care Denies Pregnant Workers Leave”. The best approach for any company is to have a policy to handle complaints of discrimination and unfair treatment, document any adverse employment action and corrective actions, and train supervisors and staff on issues relating to discrimination.

The information provided in this blog is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, then you should speak with a lawyer about your specific issues. Every legal issue is unique. A lawyer can help you with your situation. Reading the blog, contacting me through the site, emailing me or commenting on a post does not create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and me.

The information provided is my own and does not reflect the opinion of my firm or anyone else.

Office Romance: Love, Lust, & Lawsuits

Picture of a heart to demonstrate some of the issues surrounding office romance.
Photo by Clem Onojeghuo on Unsplash

February has arrived and yet again flowers and candy hearts are flying off the shelves and many men and women are hoping/planning/expecting to ask out the man/woman of their dreams. Seems simple enough, right? Riddle me this, though. What happens when your dream man/woman works with you? Maybe you share rides together. Maybe they sit in the cubicle next to yours. What if they are your boss? Or maybe you are Jim and Pam– best friends at work that end up being soulmates.

It is no surprise that many colleagues end up dating. One survey by CareerBuilder found that 38% of people have dated a colleague at some point and 31% of people that dated a colleague ended up marrying them. If you have a business or manage one, then office romance is something that you cannot ignore. It will happen in your workplace. Businesses that do not have a plan to respond to office romance can end up facing sexual harassment claims, unproductive employees, tension between employees, and employees quitting to get away from an ex.  

Companies Need a Policy on Office Romance

All workplaces need to have a policy on relationships in the workplace. Almost every workplace will have some office romances. If you have a big workplace, and especially if that workplace is in a small town, then it could be the case that you will have married individuals that have some kind of authority over their spouse. Moreover, there may be situations where a supervisor and a subordinate wish to date. These issues can be very tricky, and businesses need a tailored response to these and other complex issues.

Any policy on office romance should forbid supervisors from dating their subordinates. Too often a subordinate in this situation is not freely choosing to have the relationship or feels that they will be retaliated against if they refuse the advance of a supervisor. If an employee and a supervisor do date, then other employees can also feel that the supervisor treats their significant other better than other employees. If the relationship ends, then the supervisor may retaliate against the employee that they dated, which can lead to sexual harassment claims against the company if it is not properly addressed. Companies have the option to transfer employees to other parts of the facility where the supervisor will not be in charge of the employee should the company choose to allow a supervisor and employee to date. However, it is generally best to prohibit supervisors from dating their direct subordinates.

Ensure that the Company’s Sexual Harassment Policy is Up-to-Date

You can review my recommendations to combat sexual harassment in full here. Let’s quickly review the basics of what you need to know about sexual harassment.

Sexual harassment can include “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.” Isolated incidents that are not very serious, normal advances or flirting (like compliments), and some teasing are not harassment provided that these actions are not so frequent or severe to become a hostile work environment. Adverse employment actions (firing, discipline) that a supervisor takes because an employee refused their advances can result in a claim against the company. Most importantly, no employee should be like Bulldog in Frasier. You cannot allow an employee, no matter how valuable they seem to be to the company, to sexually harass a fellow employee. They will eventually become a liability.

You need a policy that addresses how employees can report sexual harassment, defines what sexual harassment is, and you need to train your managers and staff to be aware of and know how to address sexual harassment issues. In every workplace there is someone that will cross the line. All businesses must be vigilant in preventing and addressing sexual harassment, however, businesses that have a particular reputation of having lots of sexual banter and horseplay must be even more cautious and aware. A sexual harassment policy is only good if a company enforces it and makes sure that employees feel comfortable to report harassment.

Let’s take a look at the restaurant industry as a case study.

The Food Service Industry and Sexual Harassment

The food service and hospitality sector had more sexual harassment claims than any other sector from 2005 to 2015 with 14% of all 41,250 sexual harassment claims filed against businesses in that sector. One survey reported that 40% of women in the fast food industry experience sexual harassment. Why is sexual harassment so pervasive in this industry?

Basically, the problem in the restaurant industry is that the businesses tolerate this behavior. Some of the accusations follow the familiar pattern of a person in a place of authority that abuses their position to create a culture of fear where employees feel that they must choose between their jobs and speaking up. The harassment also often occurs through “jokes.” For example, a female employee may bend over to grab a pot, and someone makes a “joke.” If you want to hear a firsthand perspective of how bad it can be then you can read about it here.

The key thing for any business is to train its employees and managers. Have a policy that encourages employees to speak up when they witness something (bystander training). Most of all businesses need to act when something happens and make it clear to employees that sexual harassment will not be tolerated.

When Office Romance Becomes Harassment

What is the difference between flirting, jokes, and other romantic gestures and harassment? Harassment is an unwelcome advance made on another party. Here are some things to consider if you are thinking about dating a coworker.

  • Become friends with any coworker that you plan to ask out (or at least be acquaintances).

No one wants to be asked out by someone that they do not know. All coworkers should get to know someone before asking them out.

  • You only have one chance to ask someone out.

Do not ask a coworker out repeatedly. If they say no, if they say that they are busy that day, or are not available, then that is it. If they really want to go out with you, then they will come back and let you know. Real life is not like 50 first dates.

  • If they reject you, then you need to be professional and move on

This means if a coworker is rejected or if employees date and the relationship goes south, then they must resolve the situation. When coworkers are at work, they need to be professional and treat the other person the same way that they would treat any other coworker.

Conclusion

Office romance is a touchy subject especially after the revelations of the #metoo movement. All companies need to be aware of the problems that can occur when coworkers date, and they also need to be aware of and realize the potential for abuse of power in romantic situations (realized or unrealized). In today’s workplace culture, there is a thin line between office romance and sexual harassment.

P.S. Including suggestive romantic marketing materials around your workplace is probably not a good idea. Can’t you imagine a pile of these napkins on a coworker’s desk with suggestive names and numbers? Or (stalker alert) all from the same person?

The information provided in this blog is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, then you should speak with a lawyer about your specific issues. Every legal issue is unique. A lawyer can help you with your situation. Reading the blog, contacting me through the site, emailing me or commenting on a post does not create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and me.

The information provided is my own and does not reflect the opinion of my firm or anyone else.

Brett Holubeck (of Houston, Texas) is the attorney responsible for this site.