Skip to content

Tag: Union Organizing

How Does Union Organizing Begin?

As I have been explaining on my blog and podcast, the Biden administration may cause a turning point in the decline of unions as it does everything it can to support unions.

Currently, only 6% of the private workforce is unionized and 34.8% of the public workplace is unionized. The rate of overall unionization has declined from 20.1% or 17.7 million workers in 1983 (the first year for which there is data on unionization from the BLS) to 10.8% or 14.3 million workers in 2020. There are 7.2 million union members in the public sector and 7.1 million in the private sector.

Many businesses have never experienced union organizing. However, that may be about to change as I mentioned on the post with my last podcast episode. The Biden administration is the most pro-union presidency in decades. It is continuing to do more to help unions grow by encouraging the passage of the PRO Act, speaking in support of union campaigns (such as the campaign at Amazon), and the creation of a task force to find ways to support union organizing.

All of this leads to the important question…

How do Campaigns to Unionize a Company Begin?

There are two ways that unions seek to organize a company: employee driven and union driven campaigns. There are some major differences in both of these campaigns. Below are the major elements of each type of campaign.

1. Employee Driven Campaigns

An employee driven campaign is typically caused when employees want a union to fix some issue that they have with the company.

The most common issues that causes employees to seek a union are:

a. Unfair compensation

Employees may seek a union because they believe that the union will result in them receiving higher pay or more benefits. This may especially be the case if the employees are underpaid compared to others within their industry and geographic area.

b. Bad boss or supervisor

A poor supervisor that treats employees unfairly, plays favorites, and is generally unpleasant is one of the most common causes of a union organizing drive by employees. A union may be able to file grievances and represent employees that are unjustly terminated or disciplined.

Of course, on the flip side, unions also represent and sometimes get employees reinstated that should clearly not be such as this railroad engineer that defecated on a train-car Knuckle, threw toilet paper covered feces out the window of the train, and told his manager that he had left a present for him.

c. Poor safety record

The pandemic has increased employee concerns about safety. Employers that do not respond to safety problems are more at risk to unionize.

d. Poor job security

Employers that fire employees without good cause or treat employees unfairly and replace employees that should not be terminated may cause employees to feel that a union can protect their jobs.

e. Not being treated as well as employees elsewhere

If other employers are offering better pay or benefits, especially if they are unionized, then that may cause employees to seek a union.

f.   Employee coming from another unionized facility

Employees that used to work at a unionized facility may be more likely to try to establish a union at a new place of business if they had a good experience with the union.

g. Ignoring employee complaints

Employers that ignore complaints of employees risk employees believing that a union could solve the problem.

2. Union driven campaigns

Union driven campaigns, those started by a union, differ from employee driven campaigns in a number of ways. Most unions, at least the major ones, have employees that are tasked with organizing companies (union organizers). These workers may try a variety of tactics to organize a company. For some unions this may be targeting their typical worksite (like the UFCW targeting food processors). Others may have selected specific companies that they wish to organize (like the UAW trying to organize the Volkswagen facility in Chattanooga, Tennessee that has failed repeatedly).

The typical targets for unions have the following characteristics.

a. Major companies

Unions typically target major companies where they can exert political and community pressure on the company to organize.

b. Within the union’s typical sphere

Unions typically, but not always, try to focus on groups of employees that they are familiar with to organize. For example, the United Auto Workers (UAW) focuses on car manufacturing and other manufacturing employers.

c. Target for many years

Unions will typically select a company that they wish to unionize and show up every year to try to build on their support. Organizing is a long game and it may take time before the union is successful in organizing a facility.

d. Vulnerable because of other unionized facilities in the area

Targets that are vulnerable because they are located in areas with a lot of unions are often selected. If there are unions in an area, then it is likely that workers are more familiar with unions and may be more inclined to unionize. Of course, there is also the possibility that workers in an area have seen unions fail to protect jobs or protect jobs of workers who deserved to be fired, which may cause them to be less inclined to unionize.

e. Desire for large units over small ones

Unions target companies that are bigger to try to get more members, or at least the campaigns that are started by unions tend to begin this way. The median bargaining unit size is only 26 employees. Small employers can often be organized easier than larger units.

f. Contacted by employees to run a campaign

Finally, unions often take over campaigns once they are contacted by employees about forming a union. In these circumstances, much of the groundwork has been done for the union to begin organizing the facility’s workforce. It is not a union initiated campaign, but unions that receive requests to assist often jump at the chance because it is an easy way for them to secure members.

Once a union decides that a company is a target, then the union will often assign organizers to conduct the campaign until the union wins, it becomes obvious that the union will not win, or the organizers find that their time is better spent targeting other companies.

How do unions typically campaign?

3. Common Tactics by a Union in a Campaign

Unions have a number of tactics that are common in their campaigns. Of course, some campaigns are larger than others and some even involve the infamous corporate campaign, which you can read about here.

The most common tactics in a normal union organizing campaign are the following:

Fliers

Unions are likely to come to the facility, at least pre-COVID, and pass out fliers to employees in the parking lot or as they leave the facility/building if the company lacks a no-solicitation policy. 

Social media

Social media is a great tool for unions to organize meetings with employees and inform employees about unions.

 Reaching out to employees at home

Unions will try to obtain employee addresses so that they can visit them at their homes without having to come to the facility. People at their homes may be more or less open to these visits. Many employees find this to be an invasion of their privacy. Once an election is filed, employers are required to provide unions with the names, addresses, cell phone numbers and employee addresses of eligible bargaining unit employees (an Excelsior list).

Events

Unions will hold events where employees can learn about the union and the union will attempt to recruit employees that can encourage other employees to sign union authorization cards.

Email

If unions have access to email, then they will often use it to share information and invitations to union sponsored events.

Text messages/phone calls

Much in the same way as email, unions will use employee phone numbers to provide information to employees.

Target supervisors

Some unions will attempt to place a supervisor in an awkward position or make them susceptible to a possible unfair labor practice. They may do this by calling out behavior of the supervisor (whether those complaints are justified or not) or encouraging employees to report any interactions with supervisors. Supervisors need to be especially careful with their friends and relatives that work at the facility. These individuals can, and do, make reports about supervisors to the union that can lead to unfair labor practice charges against the company that names the supervisor.

Company email

In the past, unions were allowed to use company emails to communicate with employees for the purpose of organizing and other non-business purposes (this was the Purple Communications standard). This rule was overturned by the Trump NLRB board in Caesars Entertainment Corp, which reinstated the 2007 standard that allowed an employer to ban all non-business email communications. It is expected that the Biden board will go back to the Purple Communications standard at some point in the future.

Aim to file unfair labor practice charges

Unions will file unfair labor practices against employers for activity that violates the National Labor Relations Act. As a bonus for the union, if there is an election the unfair labor practices charges that involve activity occurring during the election can result in the NLRB throwing out the election results and conducting a new election if the employer wins.

Salts

Unions may have union members seek to be hired by the employer that they are targeting. This is called salting. It is essentially a way for the organizers to gain an inside look at the facility and the ability to do more than they can do as outsiders (they may be able to talk to employees or solicit them inside the facility).

Conclusion

If you would like to learn more about responding to union organizing, how employees can decertify (get rid of) a union, and other information about union organizing you can read the following posts on my blog and my podcast, Employment Law Problems:

●       How to Respond to Union Organizing: https://texaslaborlawblog.com/respond-union-organizing/

●       How to Get Rid of A Union: https://texaslaborlawblog.com/how-to-get-rid-of-a-union/

●       Amazon and responding to union organizing: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/amazon-and-responding-to-union-organizing/id1559744548?i=1000518395454

The information provided in this blog is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, then you should speak with a lawyer about your specific issues. Every legal issue is unique. A lawyer can help you with your situation. Reading the blog, contacting me through the site, emailing me or commenting on a post does not create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and me.

The information provided is my own and does not reflect the opinion of my firm or anyone else.

Amazon and Union Organizing

In the most recent episode of my podcast (https://open.spotify.com/episode/2WmK1YxI8O9SOxeEnpqWNF?si=ibYbQMwHS4-sSjh0K60D9A) I discuss Amazon’s recent union organizing drive and what companies can do in a union organizing campaign.

Why do companies and HR professionals need to educate themselves on union organizing?

It is resurging under the Biden Administration. 

This month Amazon won a union election at one of its warehouses (the results are still being challenged). This week President Biden signed an Executive Order on Worker Organizing and Empowerment. Yesterday, President Biden delivered an address to a joint session of Congress

As a result of the Executive Order, Vice President Harris will chair a task force to find ways to encourage worker/union organizing and collective bargaining. The task force may propose new laws, regulations, and other changes to support union organizing. 

During Biden’s address yesterday, he said “Wall Street didn’t build this country. The middle class built this country. And unions build the middle class. And that’s why I’m calling on Congress to pass the Protecting the Right to Organize Act – the PRO Act — and send it to my desk to support the right to unionize.” If Congress passes the PRO Act it would end right to work laws, make union organizing easier and, make it harder to be a gig worker or independent contractor. Just three more Senators are needed before the PRO Act will be brought to the Senate floor for a vote

All of these events make understanding union organizing even more important for businesses and human resources professionals. Companies and human resource representatives that are unprepared will make mistakes that could lead to liability and lawsuits. 

What is in this Episode?

In this episode, I discuss the recent union organizing drive at Amazon including some of the reasons that employees may have voted for a union and why the employees ultimately voted down the union.  

I also explore how organizing drives typically begin and the differences between the two types of organizing drives: union driven and employee driven. I analyze what causes these two different types of campaigns to start and what employers can do before a campaign begins.

Finally, I discuss what an employer can do during a union organizing campaign. I also review the concept of TIPS (threaten, interrogate, promise, or spy) so that employers can learn the basics of what they cannot do in a union organizing drive.

You can learn more about this issue from my blog post on the topic: https://texaslaborlawblog.com/respond-union-organizing/ or on the podcast episode (https://open.spotify.com/episode/2WmK1YxI8O9SOxeEnpqWNF?si=ibYbQMwHS4-sSjh0K60D9A).

The information provided in this blog is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, then you should speak with a lawyer about your specific issues. Every legal issue is unique. A lawyer can help you with your situation. Reading the blog, contacting me through the site, emailing me or commenting on a post does not create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and me.

The information provided is my own and does not reflect the opinion of my firm or anyone else.

 

2020 Labor & Employment Law Predictions Reviewed

It is that time of the year again! The time to review my 2020 labor and employment law predictions from last year to see how well they did or did not hold up. This year’s predictions are a special kind of train wreck with how COVID-19 totally changed the outcome of many of all of these predictions.

Below are my 2020 labor and employment law predictions and my review of them.

 1. Minimum Wage Increases Will Occur in a Number of States and Ballot Initiatives Will Be Undertaken to Get Them on the Ballot in Additional States

Florida, as I predicted, passed the $15 minimum wage ballot initiative with 60.82% of voters voting to pass the measure and 39.18% voting to reject the measure. A 60% supermajority was needed for the bill to pass.

Virginia passed a minimum wage law and the increase is set to take effect on May 1, 2021. Originally, the increase was to occur on January 1.

 The other ballot initiatives for minimum wage increases or minimum wage increase related issues in Arizona, Idaho, and Missouri did not make it on the ballot.

 This is something that we could see expanded into the Biden administration as he supports a $15 minimum wage. It will depend on the outcome of the senate races.

 2. Retail Closures and Other Layoffs Continue to Remain High or Accelerate

This prediction turned out to be true, but not for the reasons that I initially thought. The surge in bankruptcies and layoffs is due overwhelmingly to the coronavirus pandemic, the lockdowns, and individuals voluntarily cutting back on their shopping and outings.

According to Retail Dive, over 29 major retailers have declared bankruptcy this year compared to only 17 from last year. In 2019, over 9,500 stores closed. There is not a final count yet for this year, however, it seems likely that this will be one of the worst years since the Great Recession and maybe even the Depression.

As a result of the pandemic, about 1 out of 3 restaurants are expected to close. Approximately 100,000 businesses that temporarily shut down are now out of business (note some of these businesses could have more than one location).

Contrary to the beliefs of many people, there has been a lot of lost capital and it will take years for the economy to recover to where it was at the end of 2019. In addition, 65% of Americans think the recovery will take more than a year, and the Congressional Budget Office puts the time to recover at one decade. We will be dealing with the financial impacts of COVID-19 for a long time.

3. Onboarding and Employee Retention Continues to Grow in Importance

 Onboarding did become more important than in 2019, but not for the reasons that I initially stated. In 2019 unemployment was at record lows and median household income was up 6.8% from the prior year to $68,700. All of that changed this year as millions of people reported job losses. Onboarding is more important due to the remote nature of many workplaces, and the need to train new employees on practices regarding COVID-19 became crucial.

You can read more about onboarding in my past post.

 4. The Governmental Agencies Gear Up for the Election by Releasing a Lot of New Regulations Before the Election Happens

 This one was an easy prediction. It happened when Obama finished his term and it happened under Trump.

 Among the regulations that are being finalized are the Department of Labor’s rule on independent contractors. There are several others, but not all are related to labor and employment.

 Whether these are overturned through the Congressional Review Act will be determined by the Senate elections in Georgia and who controls the Senate.

5. Candidates Push Their Election Agendas Which Will Give us a Peek into the Labor and Employment Landscape in 2021

This is obvious again. Rather than spending time on Trump’s agenda, which has advanced a lot over the last few years, let’s turn to Joe Biden since he will become the next president. He has outlined a lot of proposals on his campaign site:

○  ban employers’ mandatory meetings with their employees, including captive audience meetings in which employees are forced to listen to anti-union rhetoric; and

○  reinstate and codify into law the Obama-Biden Administration’s “persuader rule” requiring employers to report not only information communicated to employees, but also the activities of third-party consultants who work behind the scenes to manage employers’ anti-union campaigns. 

  • “He will ensure federal contracts only go to employers who sign neutrality agreements committing not to run anti-union campaigns.”
  • He supports card check so that if a majority of employees sign an authorization card, then they can form a union without an election.
  •  End right-to-work laws that allow workers that don’t want to join a union the right to not be forced to join one. (read more about these here)  
  • Permit intermittent strikes
  • Allow independent contractors to bargain collectively
  • Increase the minimum wage to $15
  • Eliminate non-compete clauses
  • End mandatory arbitration clauses

 There will be a seismic shift in labor and employment law under Biden.

6. Union Elections and Organizing Increases this Year Especially in the Tech Sector

 This is another prediction that came true. Kickstarter became one of the first tech unions this year. There has also been a spark in interest in unions within the tech sector due to the pandemic but some think that the unions have not done enough to organize this segment of the population.

7. More States Pass Employment Related Laws- Especially Variations of the Independent Contractor Law that California Adopted (the ABC Test)

 This one did not come to be.

Governor Cuomo expressed support for the ABC test in January 2020, but the task force that would have examined the issue was ultimately scrapped because of the COVID-19 crisis. It does seem likely that they will get to it at some point in the future.

The closest it came to fruition was the election of Joe Biden, who supports the ABC test at the federal level.  

 As a reminder from my past post, the elements of the ABC test are:

  1. The worker is free from control (they determine how to do the work),
  2. The work is outside the usual business of the company, and
  3. The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade occupation, or business.

It is difficult for many workers to meet all three elements.

8. Mental Health Issues in the Workplace Become More Important

 This is the saddest prediction that came true. The coronavirus has affected everyone. It is probably one of the few events from the last 100 years that has affected practically every single person throughout the entire world.

Its effect on mental health is dramatic and tragic. During late June of 2020 a survey by the Centers for Disease Control showed that 40% of adults struggled with mental health and substance abuse; 10.7% of adults had thoughts of suicide compared to 4.3% in 2018; 25.5% of adults ages 18-24 considered suicide; and 13% of adults have started or increased substance abuse. We are a society in crisis. Workplaces need to address these issues to help their employees cope, which in turn will help employees to be better.

 9. There will be a Ton of Issues Around Free Speech and the Workplace (i.e. It is an Election Year)

It was an election year and this was spot on.

According to a survey done at Zety , 83% of people talk about politics at work. 

It is not just employees that have trouble avoiding political discussion (or getting in trouble when the discussion goes too far). One CEO emailed 10 million customers urging them to vote for Biden. Goodyear got a lot of backlash this year when it used MAGA hats as an example of items that are prohibited in the workplace. They clarified that this was an example of all items related to political speech (note that some political speech would invoke rights under the NLRA and would be protected).

There was a lot of controversy about politics in all aspects of life. In fact, according to a survey conducted for the American Psychological Association, 68% of adults indicated that the 2020 U.S. presidential election was a significant source of stress in their life.

10. The Cases Before the Supreme Court Put Increased Focus on Religion, Transgender Issues, and Sexual Orientation in the Workplace

As I mentioned in my past post, three of the Supreme Court cases last term were about religious issues.

There have been a few cases this year concerning religion, sexual orientation and the workplace (as a result of the Supreme Court’s 2019 Bostock v. Clayton decision that made discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity illegal under Title VII), but most of them have been overshadowed by COVID. Virginia enacted a law this year to make discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation illegal.

There are three cases before the Supreme Court around religious issues this term (Tanzin v. Tanvir, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, and Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski) shows the tension and need for clarification around legal matters involving religion. None of these cases deal directly with labor and employment law, but they may shed light on how the court will rule on future cases that do.

11. States Continue to Implement Restrictions on Noncompetition Agreements

This one barely came true. One state (Virginia) enacted new laws concerning non-competes this year.

The law will prohibit non-competes for employees whose average weekly wages are less than the average weekly wages for employees in Virginia. It applies to independent contractors as well, but it does not apply to employees that earn the whole or a majority of their compensation through commissions, bonuses, or other incentives.

The Washington D.C. Council has also voted to ban non-competes except for physicians. It is not clear yet whether the mayor will sign the act, but the Council has a veto proof majority, so it will not matter whether or not she vetoes the legislation. It will still have to go to the Congress for a 30-day review period.

Conclusion

2020 was a year to remember but not in a good way. It will be remembered more in the way that many people remember the years of the Great Depression. The year was consumed by the coronavirus/COVID-19. Three of the top ten google searches in 2020 were related to the virus. Hopefully, 2021 will be a much better year. Wishing you and yours a safe and happy new year! 

The information provided in this blog is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, then you should speak with a lawyer about your specific issues. Every legal issue is unique. A lawyer can help you with your situation. Reading the blog, contacting me through the site, emailing me or commenting on a post does not create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and me.

The information provided is my own and does not reflect the opinion of my firm or anyone else.

Brett Holubeck (of Houston, Texas) is the attorney responsible for this site.